High School Student builds Nuclear Fusion Reactor at home
6 Star it
Share
Naveen , Shimla:
Mar 19 2007
Made Popular Mar 19 2007
I am a bit confused to say whether I am delighted with the news or not. Well, a high school student Thiago Olson has successfully built a Nuclear Fusion Reactor at his home. I must appreciate his know-how.
Olson spent two years to look for parts and...
Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
0 Stars
Dear Shuloff
Olson’s apparatus by no means will work for producing commercial power because it takes more energy to run than it produces. But he has succeeded in creating a minuscule flash of hot plasma.
And yes, we have talked about the ITER earlier too and know the value of the positive upshot of the research work that will open the door to cleaner and abundant energy.
Cheers! At least the guy has done somethinh, which I dont think is everyone’s cup of tea.
Olson’s apparatus by no means will work for producing commercial power because it takes more energy to run than it produces. But he has succeeded in creating a minuscule flash of hot plasma.
And yes, we have talked about the ITER earlier too and know the value of the positive upshot of the research work that will open the door to cleaner and abundant energy.
Cheers! At least the guy has done somethinh, which I dont think is everyone’s cup of tea.
0 Stars
Dr. Robert Bussard, formerly of the AEC, thinks he has a way of reducing the losses so this could be a net power generator:
Easy Low Cost No Radiation Fusion
Easy Low Cost No Radiation Fusion
0 Stars
BTW the cost of the first Bussard Fusion Reactor prototype is $200 million.
Production costs would be much less.
What nation couldn’t afford 10s or hundreds of these devices?
Electrical costs would come it at aroun .1 cent per KWh. (About 1/10th of current costs).
Production costs would be much less.
What nation couldn’t afford 10s or hundreds of these devices?
Electrical costs would come it at aroun .1 cent per KWh. (About 1/10th of current costs).
Local Opinions (4)
0 Stars
This is non-sense, but reminds me all the excitement in the late 80`s about the ”cold-fusion”.
Have a look at the page of the ONLY international project studying the possibility of generating electricity by nuclear fusion:
http://www.iter.org/
The reason for being just one multinational project is that the cost has gone so high that no single nation is able to afford it anymore: do you really believe a high-school student has built one alone?
Have a look at the page of the ONLY international project studying the possibility of generating electricity by nuclear fusion:
http://www.iter.org/
The reason for being just one multinational project is that the cost has gone so high that no single nation is able to afford it anymore: do you really believe a high-school student has built one alone?
0 Stars
Dear Shuloff
Olson’s apparatus by no means will work for producing commercial power because it takes more energy to run than it produces. But he has succeeded in creating a minuscule flash of hot plasma.
And yes, we have talked about the ITER earlier too and know the value of the positive upshot of the research work that will open the door to cleaner and abundant energy.
Cheers! At least the guy has done somethinh, which I dont think is everyone’s cup of tea.
Olson’s apparatus by no means will work for producing commercial power because it takes more energy to run than it produces. But he has succeeded in creating a minuscule flash of hot plasma.
And yes, we have talked about the ITER earlier too and know the value of the positive upshot of the research work that will open the door to cleaner and abundant energy.
Cheers! At least the guy has done somethinh, which I dont think is everyone’s cup of tea.
0 Stars
Dr. Robert Bussard, formerly of the AEC, thinks he has a way of reducing the losses so this could be a net power generator:
Easy Low Cost No Radiation Fusion
Easy Low Cost No Radiation Fusion
0 Stars
BTW the cost of the first Bussard Fusion Reactor prototype is $200 million.
Production costs would be much less.
What nation couldn’t afford 10s or hundreds of these devices?
Electrical costs would come it at aroun .1 cent per KWh. (About 1/10th of current costs).
Production costs would be much less.
What nation couldn’t afford 10s or hundreds of these devices?
Electrical costs would come it at aroun .1 cent per KWh. (About 1/10th of current costs).
Global Opinions (4)
0 Stars
This is non-sense, but reminds me all the excitement in the late 80`s about the ”cold-fusion”.
Have a look at the page of the ONLY international project studying the possibility of generating electricity by nuclear fusion:
http://www.iter.org/
The reason for being just one multinational project is that the cost has gone so high that no single nation is able to afford it anymore: do you really believe a high-school student has built one alone?
Have a look at the page of the ONLY international project studying the possibility of generating electricity by nuclear fusion:
http://www.iter.org/
The reason for being just one multinational project is that the cost has gone so high that no single nation is able to afford it anymore: do you really believe a high-school student has built one alone?
0 Stars
Dear Shuloff
Olson’s apparatus by no means will work for producing commercial power because it takes more energy to run than it produces. But he has succeeded in creating a minuscule flash of hot plasma.
And yes, we have talked about the ITER earlier too and know the value of the positive upshot of the research work that will open the door to cleaner and abundant energy.
Cheers! At least the guy has done somethinh, which I dont think is everyone’s cup of tea.
Olson’s apparatus by no means will work for producing commercial power because it takes more energy to run than it produces. But he has succeeded in creating a minuscule flash of hot plasma.
And yes, we have talked about the ITER earlier too and know the value of the positive upshot of the research work that will open the door to cleaner and abundant energy.
Cheers! At least the guy has done somethinh, which I dont think is everyone’s cup of tea.
0 Stars
Dr. Robert Bussard, formerly of the AEC, thinks he has a way of reducing the losses so this could be a net power generator:
Easy Low Cost No Radiation Fusion
Easy Low Cost No Radiation Fusion
0 Stars
BTW the cost of the first Bussard Fusion Reactor prototype is $200 million.
Production costs would be much less.
What nation couldn’t afford 10s or hundreds of these devices?
Electrical costs would come it at aroun .1 cent per KWh. (About 1/10th of current costs).
Production costs would be much less.
What nation couldn’t afford 10s or hundreds of these devices?
Electrical costs would come it at aroun .1 cent per KWh. (About 1/10th of current costs).
Add your Comment
Home

Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
RSS 






Have a look at the page of the ONLY international project studying the possibility of generating electricity by nuclear fusion:
http://www.iter.org/
The reason for being just one multinational project is that the cost has gone so high that no single nation is able to afford it anymore: do you really believe a high-school student has built one alone?